Truy cập mở trong xuất bản học thuật (Bản dịch)
Thanh bên của bài viết
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Bài viết khám phá bối cảnh của truy cập mở (Open Access - OA) bao gồm nguồn gốc, sự phát triển và tình trạng hiện nay trong xuất bản học thuật. Nghiên cứu đem đến cái nhìn sâu sắc về OA, các thể loại và sự khác biệt của OA so với các mô hình đăng ký trả phí truyền thống. Bài viết đi sâu vào những ưu điểm và nhược điểm của xuất bản OA, đồng thời nêu bật các khác biệt về tỉ lệ OA giữa các ngành và khu vực địa lý khác nhau. Nhóm tác giả cũng phân tích các xu hướng và tiềm năng của OA; nhấn mạnh việc tất cả các bên liên quan trong xuất bản học thuật, bao gồm các nhà hoạch định chính sách, nhà xuất bản, nhà tài trợ nghiên cứu, chính phủ, thư viện và các hiệp hội trí thức... hiểu một cách toàn diện về OA là rất quan trọng. Điều chỉnh bản chất phức tạp của OA và thích ứng với sự thay đổi của khuynh hướng giao tiếp học thuật là vô cùng cần thiết.
Lượt tải xuống
Chi tiết bài viết
Tài liệu tham khảo
American Library Association (ALA) (2022). ISBN and ISSN Systems: General Information and Resources. LibGuides. Retrieved from https://libguides.ala.org/isbn-issn
American Physical Society (2024). Physical Review Letters. Retrieved from https://journals.aps.org/prl/
Anderson, R. (2023, December 4). Where Did the Open Access Movement Go Wrong?: An Interview with Richard Poynder. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/12/07/where-did-the-open-access-movement-go-wrong-aninterview-with-richard-poynder/
Ayman, A. R. (2019). Scopus Content Coverage Guide. https://assets.ctfassets.net/o78em1y1w4i4/EX1iy8VxBeQKf8aN2XzOp/c36f79db25484cb38a5972ad9a5472ec/Scopus_ContentCoverage_Guide_WEB.pdf
Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179.
Björk, B.C. (2011). A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e115.
Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914-923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/
Claburn, T. (2024, May 16). Wiley shuts 19 scholarly journals amid AI paper mill problems. The Register. https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/16/wiley_journals_ai/
Clarivate (2022). Journal citation reports: Quartile rankings and other metrics. (2022). Support.clarivate.com. Retrieved August 8, 2024, from https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Journal-Citation-Reports-Quartile-rankings-andother-metrics?language=en_US%20%20)
Cordón-García, J., Alonso-Arévalo, J., Gómez-Díaz, R., & Linder, D. (2013). Open access eBooks. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 121–141). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-84334-726-2.50004-5
Creative Commons (2023). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/
Crossref. (2021). About Crossref. Crossref.org. Retrieved August 8, 2024, from https://www.crossref.org/
Curcic, D. (2023, June 1). Number of academic papers published per year. Wordsrated.Retrieved 14 August 2024 from https://wordsrated.com/number-of-academic-paperspublished-per-year/
Elsevier (2024). What is peer review? Retrieved 14 July 2024 from https://www.elsevier.com/reviewer/what-is-peer-review
Else, H. (2018). Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions. Nature, 561 (7721), 17-18.
Fyfe, A. et. al. (2017). Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100
Garcia, R. N., Costas, R., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2020). Open Access uptake by universities worldwide. PeerJ, 8, e9410. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9410
Gorraiz, J., Melero-Fuentes, D., Gumpenberger, C., & Valderrama-Zurián, J.-C. (2016). Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 98–109. DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.008
Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics 118, 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
Haddow, G. (2018). Bibliometric research. In Research Methods (2nd ed.). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-03932-3
Harzing, A. W. & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 106, 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.
Hồ Mạnh Tùng et. al. (2021). A Systematic and Critical Review on the Research Landscape of Finance in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14(5). DOI: 10.3390/jrfm1405021
Kim, S., & Park, K. S. (2021). Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports. Science Editing, 8(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.226
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2012). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLOS ONE, 6(6), e20961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Nature (2020). Publishing options. Nature. Retrieved August 3, 2024, from https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/publishing-options#:~:text=Articles%20that%20are%20published%20OA,Article%20Processing%20Charge%20(APC).
Nguyen Hoang Thien & Vu Thi Ngoc Bich (2022). A statistical analysis of publication in web of science and scopus-indexed journals in the humanities and social sciences at Vietnamese universities. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 19(10), 1651-1664.
Noorden, V. R. (2014). The arXiv preprint server hits 1 million articles. Nature. Retrieved 14 July 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.16643
Palmer, K. (2024). Academic Publishers Threatened By Open-Access Expansion. The Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/government/scienceresearch-policy/2024/08/29/open-access-expansion-threatens-academic
Park, J.-H. & Shim, J. (2011). Exploring how library publishing services facilitate scholarly communication. Journal of Scholarly Publishing,43(1), 76-89. DOI: 10.1353/scp.2011.0038
Patra, N. K. D. (2017). Digital disruption and electronic resource management in libraries. Chandos Publishing.
Piwowar, H. et. al. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9(1), 12. doi:10.3390/publications9010012
Research4life. (2023, September 27). About Research4Life. Research4Life. Retrieved from https://www.research4life.org/about/
Research4life. (2024, February 12). Eligibility for access to Research4Life. Research4Life. Retrieved from https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/#groupa
Robert, P. (1999). Scholarly publishing, peer review and the internet. Firstmonday. Retrieved 14 July 2024 from https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/661/576?inline=1
RSC (Royal Society of Chemistry) (2024). Open access payments, APCs and funding. Retrieved from https://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/open-access-publishing/openaccess-payments-apcs-and-funding/#APCs
Shaw, T. & Barker, A. (2023). Open access in scholarly publishing: Where are we now? Research Information. Retrieved from https://www.researchinformation.info/feature/openaccess-scholarly-pulishing-where-are-we-now
Scipost (2024). More about SciPost and diamond open access. Openscience. Retrieved from https://www.openscience.no/en/scipost
STM Association. (2024, June 24). OA Dashboard 2024. STM. Retrieved from https://www.stm-assoc.org/oa-dashboard-2024/
Suber, P. (2012). Open Access. Cambridge: The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/open-access
Tavernier, W. (2020). COVID-19 demonstrates the value of open access. What happens next? College & Research Libraries News, 81(5), 226-230.
Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000). Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers. Special Libraries Association.
The New England Journal of Medicine (2024). Retrieved from https://www.nejm.org/
Trịnh Thị Phương Thảo et. al. (2019). The question of quality. In The Vietnamese Social Sciences at a Fork in the Road (pp. 121–142). Warsaw, Poland: Sciendo. DOI: 10.2478/9783110686081-011.
Vương Quân Hoàng (2019). The harsh world of publishing in emerging regions and implications for editors and publishers: The case of Vietnam. Learned Publishing. DOI:10.1002/leap.1255
Wiley (2024a). What is Peer Review? Retrieved 14 July 2024 from https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/what-is-peer-review/index.html
Wiley (2024b). Hybrid open access. Wiley Author Services. Retrieved 14 July 2024 from https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/open-access/hybrid-openaccess/index.html
Wiley, J & Sons. (2021, May 1). Wiley Announces the Acquisition of Hindawi. Retrieved fromhttps://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2021/Wiley-Announces-the-Acquisition-of-Hindawi/default.aspx
Zul, M. (2023, October 24). How many journal articles have been published? PublishingState.com. Retrieved from https://publishingstate.com/how-many-journal-articles-have-beenpublished/2023/#:~:text=We%20have%20learned%20that%20there,out%20of%20this%2060%20million%3F