Các xu hướng nghiên cứu dịch thuật pháp lý trên thế giới
Thanh bên của bài viết
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Legal translation is an interdisciplinary field that has increasingly attracted the interest of both domestic and international scholars. This article employs thematic analysis as a methodological approach to collect data based on keywords relevant to legal translation. More than 100 selected studies were subsequently categorized into thematic groups. The findings reveal four major research trends in the field: (1) theoretical approaches to legal translation, (2) challenges in legal translation, (3) the application of computer science in legal translation, and (4) legal translation in judicial and legislative contexts. The article still presents several limitations, such as the predominance of English-language sources, a certain degree of subjectivity in thematic analysis, and restrictions concerning the number of references. Nevertheless, based on this thematic overview and analysis, the article proposes several potential research directions for future investigations into legal translation.
Lượt tải xuống
Chi tiết bài viết
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adela-Elena, D. (2014). Difficulties and strategies in the process of legal texts translation. Management Strategies Journal, 26(4), 502–506.
Al-Shehab, M. (2013). The translatability of English legal sentences into Arabic by using Google translation. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 1(3), 18–31.
Al-Tarawneh, A., Hatab, W. A., & Al-Badawi, M. (2023). Standardizing the measures of assessment in legal translation profession. Information Sciences Letters, 12(10), 2565–2574.
Alan, T. C. (2001). Is the simultaneous mode feasible and desirable in court interpreting?
Aliverti, A., & Seoighe, R. (2017). Lost in translation? Examining the role of court interpreters in cases involving foreign national defendants in England and Wales. New Criminal Law Review, 20(1), 130–156.
AlSaeed, A. A. M., & Abdulwahab, M. M. (2023). Functional equivalence in legal translation: Legal contracts as a case study. Global Journal of Politics and Law Research, 11(3), 72–150.
Alshaikh, N. (2022). Problems of translating legal contracts: Perspectives of Saudi translation students. Journal of Politics and Law, 15, 50.
Altay, A. (2004). Difficulties encountered in the translation of legal texts. Journal of Diplomatic Language, 1(4), 1–10.
Baggio, G. (2021). The challenges of legal translation: An error analysis of trainees' translations. [Publication information missing].
Biel, Ł. (2017). Researching legal translation: A multi-perspective and mixed-method framework for legal translation. Revista de Llengua i Dret, Journal of Language and Law, 68, 76–88.
Biel, L., & Engberg, J. (2013). Research models and methods in legal translation. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series–Themes in Translation Studies, 12.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 7187-7193). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Byrne, J. (2007). Caveat translator: Understanding the legal consequences of errors in professional translation. Journal of Specialised Translation, 7, 2–24.
Camelia, C. (2014). Errors and difficulties in translating legal texts. Management Strategies Journal, 26(4), 487–492.
Cao, D. (2007). Translating law (Vol. 33). Multilingual Matters.
Cao, D. (2010). Legal translation. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies (Vol. 1, pp. 191–195). John Benjamins.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298.
Corina, I. (2021). Definition of translation, translation strategy, translation procedure, translation method, translation technique, translation transformation (p. 473). Editor Coordinator.
Emily, P. W. Y. (2005). The cultural transfer in legal translation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 18(3), 307–323.
Faradiba, C. F., & Aini, N. (2024). The use of machine translation for legal documents of university students in English department class. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Religion, Science and Education (Vol. 3, pp. 301–307).
Freeman, R. (2009). What is ‘translation’? Evidence & Policy, 5(4), 429–447.
Garzone, G. (2000). Legal translation and functionalist approaches: A contradiction in terms. AsTTi/eTi, 395.
Giampieri, P. (2024). The use of AI in the translation of legal documents: A critical analysis. trans-kom. Retrieved from https://www.trans-kom.eu
Greńczuk, A., Chomiak-Orsa, I., & Tryczyńska, K. (2024). AI-supported translation tools for legal texts: A comparative analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 246, 5545–5554.
Hale, S. (2006). Themes and methodological issues in court interpreting research. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series–Themes in Translation Studies, 5.
Hale, S. (2020). Court interpreting: The need Prieto Ramos to raise the bar: Court interpreters as specialized experts. In M. Coulthard, A. Johnson, & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 485–501). Routledge.
Harvey, M. (2000). A beginner’s course in legal translation: The case of culture-bound terms. AsTTi/eTi, 2(24), 357–369.
Harvey, M. (2002). What’s so special about legal translation? Meta, 47(2), 177–185.
Iu, K. Y., Tu, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). AI-powered legal translation: Can ChatGPT facilitate the development of Chinese common law? Available at SSRN.
Jimeno-Bulnes, M., & Hans, V. P. (2016). Legal interpreter for the jury: The role of the clerk of the court in Spain. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6(2).
Khoiriah, U. F., Siha, A. S. F., Rahmani, P. H., Sutopo, A., & Haryanti, D. (2024). Law students' perception of AI in legal document translation: Opportunities and challenges. JPGENUS: Jurnal Pendidikan Generasi Nusantara, 2(2), 210–216.
Kit, C., & Wong, T. M. (2008). Comparative evaluation of online machine translation systems with legal texts. Law Library Journal, 100, 299.
Le, T. (2003). Dịch văn bản luật pháp tiếng Việt sang tiếng Anh từ góc độ ngữ dụng học. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 19(1). Retrieved from https://js.vnu.edu.vn/FS/article/view/4055
Lee, J. (2009). When linguistic and cultural differences are not disclosed in court interpreting. Multilingua, 28(4), 379-401. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2009.017
Lee, J. (2015). Court interpreting. In H. Mikkelson & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of interpreting (pp. 186–201). Routledge.
Liu, X., & Hale, S. (2018). Achieving accuracy in a bilingual courtroom: The effectiveness of specialised legal interpreter training. The interpreter and translator trainer, 12(3), 299-321.
Mahdi, A. F. (2016). Difficulties in legal translation concerning English & Arabic. Journal of the College of Basic Education, 22(93), 21–32.
Mattila, H. E. (2013). Comparative legal linguistics: Language of law, Latin and modern lingua francas. Routledge.
Mikkelson, H. (1998). Towards a redefinition of the role of the court interpreter. Interpreting, 3(1), 21–45.
Moneus, A. M., & Sahari, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence and human translation: A contrastive study based on legal texts. Heliyon, 10(6).
Morris, R. (1999). The gum syndrome: predicaments in court interpreting. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 6(1), 6-29.
Morris, R. (2011). Images of the court interpreter: Professional identity, role definition and self-image. In Identity and status in the translational professions (pp. 209-230). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mulé, M., & Johnson, C. (2010). How effective is machine translation of legal information. Clearinghouse Review, 44, 32.
Munday, J., Pinto, S. R., & Blakesley, J. (2022). Introducing translation studies: Theories and applications. Routledge.
Nartowska, K. (2014). Court interpreter: Lawyer, psychiatrist, director or actor? Lingua Legis, (22), 44–54.
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation (Vol. 66, pp. 1–312). Prentice Hall.
Nhac, T. H. (2023). Learners’ obstacles in the translation of legal texts between English and Vietnamese. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 4(4), 61–71.
Nord, C. (1997). Translating as a purposeful activity: Functionalist approaches explained. St. Jerome Publishing.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.
Palumbo, G. (2009). Key terms in translation studies. Continuum.
Piszcz, A., & Sierocka, H. (2020). The role of culture in legal languages, legal interpretation and legal translation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 33(3), 533-542.
Pöchhacker, F. (2022). Introducing interpreting studies. Routledge
Prieto Ramos, F. (2015). Quality assurance in legal translation: Evaluating process, competence and product in the pursuit of adequacy. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 28, 11–30.
Prieto Ramos, F. (2024). Legal and institutional translator competence: developments and training implications. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 18(2), 139-147.
Riger, S., & Sigurvinsdottir, R. (2016). Thematic analysis. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Glenwick (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (pp. 33–41). Oxford University Press.
Rotman, E. (1995). The inherent problems of legal translation: Theoretical aspects. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 6, 187.
Sakai, N. (2006). Translation. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 71–78.
Sarcevic, S. (1997). New approach to legal translation. Kluwer Law International.
Sarcevic, S. (2000). Legal translation and translation theory: A receiver-oriented approach. In International Colloquium “Legal Translation, Theory/ies, and Practice”, University of Geneva (pp. 17–19).
Sofyan, R., & Rosa, R. N. (2021). Problems and strategies in translating legal texts. Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora, 20(2), 221–232.
Soriano-Barabino, G. (2020). Cultural, textual and linguistic aspects of legal translation: A model of text analysis for training legal translators. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 5(2), 285–300.
Stepanovienė, A. (2014). Difficulties encountered by students in the translation of legal texts. Public Security and Public Order, (11).
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press.
Tiersma, P. M. (2008). The nature of legal language. In J. Gibbons & M. T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics (pp. 7–25). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Way, C. (2016). The challenges and opportunities of legal translation and translator training in the 21st century. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1009–1029.
Wiesmann, E. (2019). Machine translation in the field of law: A study of the translation of Italian legal texts into German. Comparative Legilinguistics, 37(1), 117–153.